![]() |
![]() | |
Leviticus
A personal commentary by Neville Jones
And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. (Mary Magdalene 8:32)
The Bible book of Leviticus is a crude combination of two
enormously dissimilar components. The first component, overwhelmingly
larger than the second, concerns the continual ritualistic killing
associated with the so-called priestly "Israelite" tribe of Levi. The second component appears as isolated verses, or parts of verses,
interspersed throughout the book. These conspicuously stand out in clear
relief against the self-interest and gore of the first
component. This commentary will examine Leviticus as a whole, before listing what
is hereby perceived to be the small amount of genuine, God-given
instruction contained within it. (All scripture quotations are taken from the NIV, unless otherwise
indicated in the text.) Leviticus shows that its author was a Levite and that the tribe of Levi
worshipped the Devil, for it is blatantly obsessed with blood and gore,
death, destruction, injustice and sacrifice. It was probably therefore
written by Aaron or by Ezra, both of whom were Levites. The true author of Leviticus seeks to establish his own clan as a
ruling, privileged, priestly class, to be revered and provided for not
only then, but throughout successive generations. He thus invents many
reasons for bringing the priests food, and plays especially upon the
conscience of the people en mass with such concepts as "burnt offering"
(1, 6:5b-13), "grain offering" (2, 6:14-23),
"fellowship offering" (3, 7:11-21), "sin offering" (4,
5:1-13) and "guilt offering" (5:14-19, 7:1-10).
"The rest of the [particular] offering belongs to
Aaron and his sons ..." (2:3,10 cf 3:5,8,11,16,
7:31). Notice, too, how the author foresees the likelihood of there
being a glut of food at certain times and no food at others, and instructs
the people to "add salt to all your offerings."
(2:13.) However, so as not to give the game away, he deceitfully
makes no mention of food preservation, but rather precedes his instruction
with the implicit notion that the people would otherwise be guilty of
withholding salt for personal benefit, as can be seen from the full verse,
"And every oblation of thy meat offering shalt thou
season with salt; neither shalt thou suffer the salt of the covenant of
thy god to be lacking from thy meat offering: with all thine offerings
thou shalt offer salt." (2:13, KJV.)
Animals "without defect" (1:3,10,
3:1,6, 4:3,23, 14:10, etc.)
"and of the proper value" (5:15,18, 6:6, etc.) are to
be given to the Aaronid/Levitical priest to slaughter and eat, to somehow
pay the price of the sin of the person who brought it! "The priest who offers [the so-called sin offering that he
has butchered] shall eat it" (6:26).
"Any male in a priest's family may eat it; it is most holy."
(6:29.) "Aaron and his sons shall eat the rest
of [the grain offering]" (6:16). See also 6:17,18,
7:14,31-36, 14:13 and throughout. Chapter 8 describes a pagan ritual attributed to an Egyptian
called Moses. This Moses, it is claimed, ordains Aaron and Aaron's sons as
priests. It is likely that Moses really did exist, but who exactly was he?
And what of Mount Sinai and the desert of Sinai (7:38), where are
these? Some say Egypt, some say Saudi Arabia, some Iran and some Palestine.
Why do we not know for sure where they are? Chapter 11 instructs people that, for some reason, various creatures
are "detestable" (11:10,12,13, etc). This leads both to the concept of
God's created things being clean or unclean and to the concept of magic
(11:32, etc). Notice also that the people who accept these complicated
"laws" without questioning them would need to rely completely on the
priest for their interpretation, as is further evident in Chapter 13
where reliance upon the priest for skin rashes and for mildew seem to ensure
that the priests are going to have a constant supply of clothing and
(probably) housing. Indeed, 14:33-47 places the priest in an excellent
position to be bribed by builders and home owners, with priest-assessed
mildew necessitating new stones, plastering, or even a new house
altogether. So, provide the "priest" and his family with food (preserved in salt,
of course, because the so-called "atonement" is not simple blood-letting,
but the subsequent eating of the animal) and the supplier of the meat
would then be supposedly clean (14:19,20), as long as it was an animal
"without defect" and of the correct "value." What does the necessary
sacrifice depend upon? Wealth! (14:21-32.) Sacrificial "atonement" is also claimed to be necessary for the bricks
and mortar of the non-priest's house (!), as detailed in 14:48-53, and
there is some ridiculous, blasphemous mumbo jumbo regarding ear lobes,
thumbs and big toes in 14:14-18. How did Aaron or Ezra convince the
poor, gullible people of this nonsense? Simple: claim that it was given
privately by God to Moses, and that the meaning of it all is too deep a
mystery to be understood by anyone except the local priest (also known as
the Emperor's Jewish tailor). Chapter 12 places guilt and the need for "atonement" upon a woman
for being - wait for it - a mother! Such degradation of women is further
encouraged in 27:1-8, where males are assigned more value than females,
and women are made out to be unclean because of normal menstruation (which was
designed by God when women were created, of course) in 15:19-24. There is Kabbalistic black magic, freemasonry and debauchery in Chapter
16, including the introduction of the scapegoat that supposedly carries
away all of the sins of the so-called "Israelites" (16:7-10 and 20-22).
This concept of a scapegoat has been essential and indispensable to the
Zionist movement; a movement that has, throughout history, committed innumerable
atrocities and then deviously pinned the blame for them on all and sundry but
themselves, for example Germany (World Wars I and II) and the Muslims (World
Trade Center, New York). As well as demonizing other people with false flag
operations (see Judicial-inc.biz), the scapegoat concept has facilitated
the so-called "Israelites" to both steal the land of Palestine and to live
off the immoral earnings of their "Holocaust" scam by setting up the
former German Chancellor, Herr Hitler, as a major scapegoat in the minds
of millions of gullible individuals. The author of Leviticus (i.e., Aaron or Ezra) had to take steps to look
after his clan's interests in verse 17:5, where the "Israelites" had
to stop doing their own sacrifices "in the open fields.
They must bring them to the priest [whoops], that is, [er] to the Lord ..."
The creatures that the priests want in order to satisfy their
carnivorous lust are termed "sacred contributions"
(22:12), and "anyone eat[ing] a sacred offering by
mistake ... must make restitution to the priest for the offering and add a
fifth of the value to it." (22:14.) The flesh of killed animals
is referred to in 22:25 as "the food of your god."
As for the remainder of this Devil-inspired garbage: 23:15-21 is
characteristically vile, by calling for more and more "sacred contributions";
23:42,43 deals with the "law" of living in booths (see Friedman);
23:33-36,39-41, etc., is numerology, and 24:5-9 is further
looking after "Aaron and his sons." Zionist philosophy rears its ugly head in 24:10-23, property rules
and regulations (that again would mean reliance upon the priest) are invented
in 25:13-34 and slavery is legitimized in 25:39-55. The god (in Hebrew, "el") of Ezra (written right to left in Hebrew as Ezra
el = Isra el = Israel) is revealed in 26:14-46 and particularly
26:27-45, as a spiteful, vindictive, discompassionate and irrational
aggressor, as I believe Professor Richard Dawkins regularly asserts. Unbeknown
to Prof. Dawkins, however, this god is the Devil (who Christ identifies as being
the father of the Jews in Chapter 8 of Mary Magdalene's gospel). The final chapter (27) is there in order to give enormous power to
the priests in the name of their "god" and 27:1-13 seems to talk of
human sacrifices. Thus death, destruction, self-interest and mendacity, all desired by the
Devil, constitute the major part of Leviticus. To say that this disgusting
book was dictated to Moses by God is without doubt a lie and a blasphemy.
The book is one long ritualistic slaughter of God's creatures from
beginning to end, showing clearly that the god of the man who wrote it was
the Devil. And that author, in my opinion, was Ezra, who, in the manner that is so
characteristic of a pathological liar, mixed just a little bit of truth in
with the lies, so as to try and give credence to the whole thing.
References Friedman, R.E., 1997, "Who Wrote The Bible?," 2nd ed., HarperCollins, New York. International Bible Society, 1984, "The Holy Bible," New International Version (NIV), Hodder & Stoughton, London. |
||
![]() |
![]() |