Many people take joy in saying Wall Street and Jewish bankers "financed Hitler." There is plenty of documented evidence that Wall Street and Jewish bankers did indeed help finance Adolf Hitler at first. However, when Germany decided to break free from the bankers, the Jews declared a world war against Germany.

Let us consider the facts. Los Angeles Attorney Ellen Brown discusses this topic in her book, "Web of Debt" ...

When Hitler came to power, Germany was hopelessly broke. The Treaty of Versailles had imposed crushing reparations on the German people, demanding that Germans repay every nation's costs of the First World War. These costs totaled three times the value of all the property in Germany. Private currency speculators caused the German mark to plummet, precipitating one of the worst runaway inflations in modern times. A wheelbarrow full of 100-milliard-mark banknotes could not buy a loaf of bread. The national treasury was empty. Countless homes and farms were lost to speculators and to private banks. Germans lived in hovels. They were starving.

Fifty million marks, issued September 1923.

 

One hundred milliard marks, issued October 1923.

 

On 11th October, 1924, after a transitionary period, the monetary unit of Germany was changed from the papiermark to the Reichsmark, where 1 Reichsmark = 1 billion (which is 1,000,000,000,000) papiermark.

Nothing like this had ever happened before - the total destruction of the national currency, plus the wiping out of people's savings and businesses. On top of this came a global depression. Germany had no choice but to succumb to debt slavery under international bankers until 1933, when the National Socialists came to power.

At that point the German government thwarted the international banking cartels by issuing its own money. World Jewry responded by declaring war against Germany.

His Excellency, Chancellor Adolf Hitler began a national credit program by devising a plan of public works that included flood control, repair of public buildings and private residences, and construction of new roads, bridges, canals, and port facilities. All these were paid for with money that no longer came from the Jewish international bankers.

The projected cost of these various programs was fixed at one milliard units of the national currency. To pay for this, the German government (not the Jews) issued bills of exchange, called Labour Treasury Certificates. In this way the National Socialists put millions of people to work, and paid them with these Labour Treasury Certificates.

Under the National Socialists, Germany's money did not rely upon gold (which had been bought up by the Jewish bankers). It was essentially a receipt for labour and materials delivered to the government. Hitler said, "For every mark issued, we required the equivalent of a mark's worth of work done, or goods produced." The government paid workers in Certificates. Workers spent those Certificates on other goods and services, thus creating more jobs for more people. In this way the German people climbed out of the crushing debt imposed upon them primarily by Jewish international bankers.

Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved, and Germany was back on its feet. It had a solid, stable currency, with no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries (controlled by Jewish international banksters) were still out of work. Within five years, Germany went from the poorest nation in Europe to the richest. Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, despite the international bankers' denial of foreign credit to Germany, and despite the global boycott by Jewish-owned industries. Germany succeeded in this by exchanging equipment and commodities directly with other countries, using a barter system that cut the bankers out of the picture. Germany flourished, since barter eliminates national debt and trade deficits. (Venezuela does the same thing today when it trades oil for commodities, plus medical help, and so on. Hence the Zionist Jews are now trying to squeeze Venezuela.)

Germany's economic freedom was short-lived, because of the war brought against it by the Zionists and their whores in the British and American governments; but it left several monuments, including the famous Autobahn, the world's first extensive superhighway. Hjalmar Schacht, a Rothschild agent who was temporarily head of the German central bank, summed it up thus ... An American banker had commented, "Dr. Schacht, you should come to America. We've lots of money, that's real banking." Schacht replied, "You should come to Berlin. We don't have money. That's real banking." (Schacht, the Rothschild agent, supported the Zionist Jewish bankers against Germany, and was rewarded by having all charges against him dropped at the Nürnberg show trials.)

This economic freedom made Adolf Hitler extremely popular with the German people. Germany was rescued from English economic "theory," which says that all currency must be borrowed against the gold owned by a private and secretive banking cartel - such as the Federal Reserve, or the Central Bank of Europe - rather than issued by the government for the benefit of the people. Canadian researcher Dr. Henry Makow (who is Jewish himself) says the main reason why the bankers arranged for a world war against Germany was that Adolf Hitler sidestepped the bankers by creating his own money, thereby freeing the German people from usurious debt. Worse, this freedom and prosperity threatened to spread to other nations. Therefore, Hitler had to be stopped!

Economist Henry C. K. Liu writes of Germany's remarkable transformation, "The Nazis came to power in 1933 when the German economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began." (Henry C. K. Liu, "Nazism and the German Economic Miracle," Asia Times, 24th May 2005.)

Sheldon Emry wrote, "Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts for Germany's startling rise from the depression to a world power in five years. The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers." (Sheldon Emry, "Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People" 1984.)

These facts do not appear in any textbooks today. What does appear is the disastrous runaway inflation suffered in 1923 by the Weimar Republic, which governed Germany from 1919 to 1933. Today's textbooks use this inflation to twist truth into its opposite. They cite the radical devaluation of the German mark as an example of what goes wrong when governments print their own money, rather than borrow it from private cartels.

In reality, the Weimar financial crisis began with the impossible reparations payments imposed at the Treaty of Versailles. Hjalmar Schacht, who was never a Nazi Party member (and now it appears clear why that was the case), the Rothschild agent who was currency commissioner for the Republic for a time, opposed letting the German government print its own money ... "The Treaty of Versailles is a model of ingenious measures for the economic destruction of Germany. Germany could not find any way of holding its head above the water, other than by the inflationary expedient of printing bank notes."

In this quote we see Schacht echoing the textbook lie that Weimar inflation was caused when the German government printed its own money. However, in his 1967 book The Magic of Money, Schacht let the cat out of the bag by revealing that it was the PRIVATELY-OWNED Reich bank, not the German government, that was pumping new currency into the economy. Thus, the PRIVATE BANK caused the Weimar hyper-inflation.

What drove the post-WWI inflation into hyper-inflation was speculation by foreign investors, who sold the mark short, betting on its decreasing value. Speculation in the German mark was made possible because the PRIVATELY OWNED Reich bank (not yet under Nazi control) made massive amounts of currency available for borrowing. This currency, like U.S. currency today, was created with accounting entries on the bank's ledgers. Then the funny-money was lent at compound interest. When the Reich bank could not keep up with the voracious demand for marks, other private banks were allowed to create marks out of nothing, and to lend them with usury. The result was runaway debt and inflation.

Thus, according to Schacht himself, the German government did not cause the Weimar hyper-inflation. On the contrary, the government (under the National Socialists) eliminated hyper-inflation.

The National Socialists put the Reich bank under strict government regulation, and took prompt corrective measures to eliminate foreign speculation. One of those measures was to eliminate easy access to funny-money loans from private banks. Then His Excellency, Chancellor Adolf Hitler got Germany back on its feet by having the public government issue Treasury Certificates.

Schacht, the Rothschild agent, disapproved of this government fiat money, and wound up getting fired as head of the Reich bank when he refused to issue it. Nonetheless, he acknowledged in his later memoirs that allowing the government to issue the money it needed did not produce the price inflation predicted by classical economic "theory," which says that currency must be borrowed from private cartels.

What causes hyper-inflation is uncontrolled speculation. When speculation is coupled with debt (owed to private banking cartels) the result is disaster. On the other hand, when a government issues currency in carefully measured ways, it causes supply and demand to increase together, leaving prices unaffected. Hence there is no inflation, no debt, no unemployment, and no need for income taxes.

Naturally this terrifies the bankers, since it eliminates their powers. It also terrifies the Zionists, firstly because it prevents wars from starting, and secondly because their control of banking allows them to buy the media, the government, and everything else.

Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying that, "[British Prime Minister] Neville Chamberlain stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war." ("The Forrestal Diaries," Millis, ed., Cassell, 1952, p.129.)

Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General J.F.C. Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says, "Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands ... when bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe. ... It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign ... no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries. ... Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike camps. ... President Roosevelt has been given the power ... to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for." (Fuller, J.F.C., "The Decisive Battles of the Western World," vol. 3, pp. 372-374.)

At the end of the First World War, Germany was essentially tricked (see Paul Johnson, "A History of the Modern World," 1983, p. 24 and H. Nicholson, "Peacemaking 1919," 1933, pp. 13-16) into paying massive reparations to France and other economic competitors and former belligerent countries in terms of the so-called Treaty of Versailles, thanks to the liberal American President, Woodrow Wilson. Germany was declared to be solely responsible for the war, in spite of the fact that "Germany did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made genuine efforts, though too belated, to avert one," (Professor Sydney B. Fay, "The Origins of the World War," vol. 2, p. 552).

As a result of these massive enforced financial reparations, by 1923 the situation in Germany became desperate and inflation on an astronomical scale became the only way out for the government. Printing presses were engaged to print money around the clock. In 1921 the exchange rate was 75 marks to the dollar. By 1924 this had become about 5 billion (5,000,000,000,000) marks to the dollar. This virtually destroyed the German middle class (Koestler, A., "The God that Failed," p. 28), reducing any bank savings to virtually zero.

According to Sir Arthur Bryant, the British historian ("Unfinished Victory," 1940, pp. 136-144), "It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary 'flair' for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities. ... They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938 ... they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich. Most of it came into their hands during the inflation [period that they had engineered]. ... But to those who had lost their all this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions. ... The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics, business and the learned professions (in spite of constituting) less than one percent of the population. ... The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically all controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press - all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed. ... The largest newspaper combine in the country, with a daily circulation of four million, was a Jewish monopoly. ... Every year it became harder and harder for a non-Jew to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged occupation. ... At this time it was not the 'Aryans' who exercised racial discrimination."

A book unexpectedly published by Princeton University Press in 1984 (Sarah Gordon, "Hitler, Germans and the 'Jewish Question' "), essentially confirms what Bryant says. According to her, "Jews were never a large percentage of the total German population; at no time did they exceed 1% of the population during the years 1871-1933." But she adds, "Jews were over-represented in business, commerce, and public and private service. ... They were especially visible in private banking in Berlin, which in 1923 had 150 private Jewish banks, as opposed to only 11 private non-Jewish banks. ... Jews were very active in the stock market, particularly in Berlin, where in 1928 they comprised 80% of the leading members of the stock exchange. By 1933, when the Nazis began eliminating Jews from prominent positions, 85% of the brokers on the Berlin Stock exchange were dismissed because of their race. ... At least a quarter of full professors and instructors (at German universities) had Jewish origins. ... In 1905-6 Jewish students comprised 25% of the law and medical students. ... In 1931, 50% of the 234 theatre directors in Germany were Jewish, and in Berlin the number was 80%," etc., etc.

Arthur Koestler confirms the Jewish over-involvement in German publishing. "Ullstein's was a kind of super-trust; the largest organization of its kind in Europe, and probably in the world. They published four daily papers in Berlin alone, among these the venerable Vossische Zeitung, founded in the eighteenth century, and the B.Z. am Mittag, an evening paper. ... Apart from these, Ullsteins' published more than a dozen weekly and monthly periodicals, ran their own news service, their own travel agency, etc., and were one of the leading book publishers. The firm was owned by the brothers Ullstein - they were five, like the original Rothschild brothers, and like them also, they were Jews." ("The God that Failed," R.H.S. Crossman, ed., 1950, p 31.)

Edgar Mowrer, Berlin correspondent for the Chicago Daily News, wrote, "No one who lived through the period from 1919 to 1926 is likely to forget the sexual promiscuity that prevailed. ... Throughout a town like Berlin, hotels and pensions made vast fortunes by letting rooms by the hour or day to baggageless, unregistered guests. Hundreds of cabarets, pleasure resorts and the like served for purposes of getting acquainted and acquiring the proper mood" (pp. 153-4). Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. He adds, "Most of [the night clubs and vice-resorts] were owned and managed by Jews" (pp. 144-5).

Douglas Reed, Chief Central European correspondent before WWII for the London Times, was profoundly anti-German and anti-Hitler. But nevertheless he stated, "In the Berlin [of pre-Hitler years] most of the theatres were Jewish-owned or Jewish-leased, most of the leading film and stage actors were Jews, the plays performed were often by German, Austrian or Hungarian Jews and were staged by Jewish film producers, applauded by Jewish dramatic critics in Jewish newspapers. ... The Jews are not cleverer than the Gentiles, if by clever you mean good at their jobs. They ruthlessly exploit the common feeling of Jews, first to get a foothold in a particular trade or calling, then to squeeze the non-Jews out of it. ... It is not true that Jews are better journalists than Gentiles. They held all the posts on those Berlin papers because the proprietors and editors were Jewish." (Douglas Reed, "Disgrace Abounding," 1939, pp. 238-9.)

Jews were (rightly) perceived as dangerous enemies of Germany. The London Daily Express of 24th March 1933 carried the headline "Judea Declares War on Germany."

Hitler saw the tremendous danger posed to Germany by Communism. He appreciated the desperate need to eliminate this threat, a fact that earned him the immense hatred and animosity of the Jewish organisations and the media and politicians of the west which they could influence. After all, according to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant, although Jews formed less than five percent of Russia's population, they formed more than fifty percent of its revolutionaries. (Chaim Bermant, "The Jews," 1977.)

In Chapter 8 of this book, Chaim Bermant states, "It must be added that most of the leading revolutionaries who convulsed Europe in the final decades of the last century and the first decades of this one, stemmed from prosperous Jewish families. ... They were perhaps typified by the father of revolution, Karl Marx. ... Thus when, after the chaos of World War I, revolutions broke out all over Europe, Jews were everywhere at the helm; Trotsky, Sverdlov, Kamenev and Zinoviev in Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Kurt Eisner in Bavaria, and, most improbable of all, Rosa Luxemburg in Berlin.

"The leadership of the Bolshevik Party had a preponderance of Jews. ... Of the seven members of the Politburo, the inner cabinet of the country, four, Trotsky (Bronstein), Zinoviev (Radomsky), Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Sverdlov, were Jews."

Other authors agree with this.

Hitler came to power in Germany with two main aims, the rectification of the unjust provisions of the Versailles Treaty, and the destruction of the Soviet/Communist threat to Germany. Strangely enough, contrary to the mythology created by those who had an opposing ethnic agenda, he had no plans or desire for a larger war of conquest. Professor A.J.P. Taylor showed this in his book, "The Origins of the Second World War," to the disappointment of the professional western political establishment. Taylor says, "The state of German armament in 1939 gives the decisive proof that Hitler was not contemplating general war, and probably not intending war at all" (p.267), and "Even in 1939 the German army was not equipped for a prolonged war; and in 1940 the German land forces were inferior to the French in everything except leadership" (p104-5).

Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, "The Other Side of the Hill, 1948," Pan Books, 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain's most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order: "He [Hitler] then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilisation that Britain had brought into the world." (Page 200.) According to Liddell Hart, "At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the 'Battle over Britain' had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing to spur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia." (Page 140.) David Irving in the foreword to his book, "The Warpath" (1978), refers to "the discovery ... that at no time did this man [Hitler] pose or intend a real threat to Britain or the Empire." This gives a completely different complexion, not only to the war, but to the successful suppression of this information during the war and afterwards. Historians today know only too well where the boundaries lie within which they can paint their pictures of the war and its aftermath, and the consequences of venturing beyond those boundaries, irrespective of the evidence. Unfortunately, only too few of them have been prepared to have the courage to break out of this dreadful straitjacket of official and unofficial censorship.

(Based primarily on an article that appeared in Pakistan Daily on Friday, 15th May, 2009.)